Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein

368 U.S. 950, 82 S. Ct. 392
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 8, 1962
DocketNo. 138
StatusPublished

This text of 368 U.S. 950 (Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 368 U.S. 950, 82 S. Ct. 392 (1962).

Opinion

Certiorari, ante, p. 812, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion to substitute Robert E. Doyle, John C. Hart and Benjamin H. Balcom in the place of Grant F. Daniels, Thomas E. Rohan and Samuel M. Birnbaum as parties respondent granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
368 U.S. 950, 82 S. Ct. 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/idlewild-bon-voyage-liquor-corp-v-epstein-scotus-1962.