Scarlett v. Scarlett

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scarlett v. Scarlett

736 So. 2d 125, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8536, 1999 WL 420381

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 1999

DocketNo. 98-3380

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 736 So. 2d 125 (Scarlett v. Scarlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scarlett v. Scarlett, 736 So. 2d 125, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8536, 1999 WL 420381 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, J.

This is an appeal from a marriage dissolution judgment. The final hearing was unrecorded and thus no transcript is available for our review of the evidence. Further, appellant did not supply us with a stipulated statement to support his contentions regarding the evidence. We have no option except to affirm the judgment as far as the evidentiary attacks are concerned. Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

However, it appears from the judgment that mathematical calculations were made in error and that arrearages were ordered where unwarranted. Because we must remand this case for recalculation and a new judgment, it is in the interest of the parties and the children to allow the parties to have a rehearing on all support [126]*126matters. The judgment is otherwise affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI