Beasley v. Beasley

463 So. 2d 1248, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 476
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 1985
Docket83-1327
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 463 So. 2d 1248 (Beasley v. Beasley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So. 2d 1248, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 476 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

463 So.2d 1248 (1985)

In re the Marriage of Ronald Wayne BEASLEY, Appellant,
v.
Corrie Gail BEASLEY, Appellee.

No. 83-1327.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

February 21, 1985.

Thomas W. Gibson of Trickel, Leigh, Gibson & Martin, Orlando, for appellant.

James P. Curry of Curry, Taylor & Carls, Orlando, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal in a marriage dissolution case. Although appellant presents a compelling argument for the reversal or modification of an alimony award he has not furnished this court with a transcript of the evidence taken at trial which led to the court's decision. Financial affidavits, without supporting testimony, are not sufficient for our review of a case. Unless this court is provided with all of the evidence which was before the trial court, either by a transcript of testimony or a stipulated statement, then we cannot fault and reverse a trial judge for a purported error.

Appeals such as this shall be subject to summary dismissal in the future, and motions for attorney's fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes, will be favorably entertained.

AFFIRMED.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrison v. Harrison
909 So. 2d 318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Scarlett v. Scarlett
736 So. 2d 125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Wade v. Wade
710 So. 2d 1387 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Hagy v. Hagy
600 So. 2d 1197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Kirchinger v. Kirchinger
546 So. 2d 86 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Titus Bros. Roofing Co. v. Blank
542 So. 2d 439 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Chisholm v. Chisholm
538 So. 2d 961 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Carter v. Carter
504 So. 2d 418 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Thomas v. Thomas
498 So. 2d 668 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Hardage v. State ex rel. Hardage
482 So. 2d 602 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Rainaldi's Plumbing & Supplies, Inc. v. Central Florida Investments, Inc.
478 So. 2d 431 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Bei v. Harper
475 So. 2d 912 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
463 So. 2d 1248, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beasley-v-beasley-fladistctapp-1985.