Scaringe v. Ackerman
This text of 501 N.E.2d 593 (Scaringe v. Ackerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice John T. Casey at the Appellate Division (119 AD2d 327). We add that our decision does not preclude a future challenge to respondent Ackerman’s qualifications in the appropriate forum (see, NY Const, art III, § 9; Matter of Harwood v Meisser, 41 AD2d 531, affd 31 NY2d 1000).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr. Taking no part: Judge Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
501 N.E.2d 593, 68 N.Y.2d 885, 508 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scaringe-v-ackerman-ny-1986.