Scarborough v. Walmart Corp.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2152

BERNARD SCARBOROUGH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WALMART CORPORATION, f/k/a Wal-Mart Super Center Stores, Incorporated,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00263-GCM)

Submitted: May 24, 2011 Decided: June 3, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Scarborough, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Stephen Clarke, LITTLER MENDELSON, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bernard Scarborough appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his employment discrimination and malicious

prosecution action for failure to state a clam. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Scarborough v. Walmart Corp., No. 3:10-cv-00263-GCM (W.D.N.C.

Sept. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED