Scarborough v. Walmart Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Scarborough v. Walmart Corp.

434 F. App'x 180

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 3, 2011·No. No. 10-2152·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Scarborough appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination and malicious prosecution action for failure to state a clam. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scarborough v. Walmart Corp., No. 3:10-cv-00263-GCM (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Scarborough appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination and malicious prosecution action for failure to state a clam. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scarborough v. Walmart Corp., No. 3:10-cv-00263-GCM (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Scarborough v. Walmart Corp., 434 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

434 F. App'x 180 (Scarborough v. Walmart Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.