Scarborough v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Scarborough v. United States

496 A.2d 277, 1985 D.C. App. LEXIS 452

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 7, 1985

DocketNo. 84-754

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 496 A.2d 277 (Scarborough v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scarborough v. United States, 496 A.2d 277, 1985 D.C. App. LEXIS 452 (D.C. 1985).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

We affirm appellant’s conviction for receiving stolen property (felony), D.C.Code § 22-2205 (1981) — as we conclude we must, see M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310 (D.C.1971) — on the basis of the second holding of Barkley v. United States, 455 A.2d 412, 415-16 (D.C.1983). However, because we find Barkley unpersuasive authority, and a majority of this division would reverse if free to do so, we express our views in the separate “concurring” opinions below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We affirm appellant’s conviction for receiving stolen property (felony), D.C.Code § 22-2205 (1981) — as we conclude we must, see M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310 (D.C.1971) — on the basis of the second holding of Barkley v. United States, 455 A.2d 412, 415-16 (D.C.1983). However, because we find Barkley unpersuasive authority, and a majority of this division would reverse if free to do so, we express our views in the separate “concurring” opinions below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

496 A.2d 277, 1985 D.C. App. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scarborough-v-united-states-dc-1985.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack