Scarborough v. United States
496 A.2d 277, 1985 D.C. App. LEXIS 452
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided August 7, 1985·No. No. 84-754·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinions
We affirm appellant’s conviction for receiving stolen property (felony), D.C.Code § 22-2205 (1981) — as we conclude we must, see M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310 (D.C.1971) — on the basis of the second holding of Barkley v. United States, 455 A.2d 412, 415-16 (D.C.1983). However, because we find Barkley unpersuasive authority, and a majority of this division would reverse if free to do so, we express our views in the separate “concurring” opinions below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scarborough v. United States, 496 A.2d 277, 1985 D.C. App. LEXIS 452 (D.C. 1985).
496 A.2d 277 (Scarborough v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Horton v. United States
541 A.2d 604 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1988)
Scarborough v. United States
522 A.2d 869 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)