Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Scalise Industries, Inc. v. Murdock

Scalise Industries, Inc. v. Murdock

21 A.D.3d 1345, 801 N.Y.S.2d 186
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scalise Industries, Inc. v. Murdock. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 A.D.3d 1346 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2005·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Michael E. Daley, J.), entered January 20, 2005. The order, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby [1346]*1346is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scalise Industries, Inc. v. Murdock, 21 A.D.3d 1345, 801 N.Y.S.2d 186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

21 A.D.3d 1345 (Scalise Industries, Inc. v. Murdock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)