Scalise Industries, Inc. v. Murdock

21 A.D.3d 1345, 801 N.Y.S.2d 186
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 2005
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.3d 1345 (Scalise Industries, Inc. v. Murdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scalise Industries, Inc. v. Murdock, 21 A.D.3d 1345, 801 N.Y.S.2d 186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Michael E. Daley, J.), entered January 20, 2005. The order, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby [1346]*1346is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A.D.3d 1345, 801 N.Y.S.2d 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scalise-industries-inc-v-murdock-nyappdiv-2005.