Scala v. State

770 So. 2d 732, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14632, 2000 WL 1671429
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 2000·No. No. 4D00-1249·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions for burglary of an occupied dwelling and grand theft, but reverse the additional conviction and sentence for failure to appear.

Conviction for a charge not made by information or indictment is a denial of due process, and the complete failure to charge a crime is a defect that'can be raised at [733]*733any time, including on appeal. See State v. Gray, 435 So.2d 816 (Fla.1983). We accept the state’s concession of error and reverse the appellant’s conviction and sentence for failure to appear. See, Perry v. State, 663 So.2d 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

We remand and direct the trial court to vacate the conviction and sentence for failure to appear.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL, GUNTHER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scala v. State, 770 So. 2d 732, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14632, 2000 WL 1671429 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

770 So. 2d 732 (Scala v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dooley v. State
933 So. 2d 730 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Frazier v. State
871 So. 2d 1036 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)