Sayre v. Rose

3 N.J.L. 743
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 15, 1811·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

— Without taking notice of the insufficiency of the state of demand, the action cannot he sustained. The plaintiff below has misconceived his action, as the action is brought for a breach of covenant in an indenture; it ought to have been an action of covenant.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sayre v. Rose, 3 N.J.L. 743 (N.J. 1811).

3 N.J.L. 743 (Sayre v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.