Sayre v. Rose
3 N.J.L. 743
This text of 3 N.J.L. 743 (Sayre v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sayre v. Rose, 3 N.J.L. 743 (N.J. 1811).
Opinion
— Without taking notice of the insufficiency of the state of demand, the action cannot he sustained. The plaintiff below has misconceived his action, as the action is brought for a breach of covenant in an indenture; it ought to have been an action of covenant.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sayre-v-rose-nj-1811.