Sayre v. Hoelzle-Sayre
This text of 1995 Ohio 274 (Sayre v. Hoelzle-Sayre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 1218.]
SAYRE, APPELLEE, v. HOELZLE-SAYRE, APPELLANT. [Cite as Sayre v. Hoelzle-Sayre, 1995-Ohio-274.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 94-1094—Submitted June 6, 1995—Decided July 19, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Seneca County, No. 13-93-32. __________________ B. Mark Davis, for appellee. Britz & Zemmelman and Harland M. Britz, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. RESNICK, J., dissents, and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand for a new hearing. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1995 Ohio 274, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sayre-v-hoelzle-sayre-ohio-1995.