Saxony Hotel v. Zins

Supreme Court of Florida

Saxony Hotel v. Zins

343 So. 2d 838, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3849

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 10, 1977

DocketNo. 49815

StatusPublished

This text of 343 So. 2d 838 (Saxony Hotel v. Zins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saxony Hotel v. Zins, 343 So. 2d 838, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3849 (Fla. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review by petition for writ of certiorari an order of the Industrial Relations Commission reversing a decision of a Judge of Industrial Claims on the ground, inter alia, that it was not entered within the 30-day period set forth in Section 440.-25(3)(b), Florida Statutes. The Commission’s order was filed on June 11, 1976.

Since the entry of the Commission’s order in the instant case, this Court has decided Scottie-Craft Boat Corp. v. Smith, 336 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1976); Miller v. Oolite Industries, Inc., 336 So.2d 1152 (Fla.1976); and Misal Industries v. Hartman, 339 So.2d 655 (Fla.1976). On the authority of those decisions, we now grant the petition for certiorari in this cause, quash the order of the Industrial Relations Commission, and remand to the Commission for reconsideration in light of our more recent decisions.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review by petition for writ of certiorari an order of the Industrial Relations Commission reversing a decision of a Judge of Industrial Claims on the ground, inter alia, that it was not entered within the 30-day period set forth in Section 440.-25(3)(b), Florida Statutes. The Commission’s order was filed on June 11, 1976.

Since the entry of the Commission’s order in the instant case, this Court has decided Scottie-Craft Boat Corp. v. Smith, 336 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1976); Miller v. Oolite Industries, Inc., 336 So.2d 1152 (Fla.1976); and Misal Industries v. Hartman, 339 So.2d 655 (Fla.1976). On the authority of those decisions, we now grant the petition for certiorari in this cause, quash the order of the Industrial Relations Commission, and remand to the Commission for reconsideration in light of our more recent decisions.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

343 So. 2d 838, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saxony-hotel-v-zins-fla-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack