Misal Industries v. Hartman
This text of 339 So. 2d 655 (Misal Industries v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have for review by petition for writ of certiorari an order of the Industrial Relations Commission reversing a decision of a Judge of Industrial Claims on the sole basis that it was not entered within the thirty-day period specified in Section 440.25(3)(b), Florida Statutes.
Since the entry of the Commission’s order in this case, we have decided Scottie-Craft Boat Corp. v. Smith, Fla., 336 So.2d 1150, and Miller v. Oolite Industries, Inc., Fla., 336 So.2d 1152, opinions filed July 30, 1976. On the authority of those decisions, we now grant the petition in the instant ease, quash the order of the Industrial Relations Commission, and remand to the Commission for a determination whether on the facts of this case a trial de novo before a Judge of Industrial Claims is necessary.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
339 So. 2d 655, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/misal-industries-v-hartman-fla-1976.