Saxon v. Metro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Saxon v. Metro

213 P.3d 861, 230 Or. App. 247

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 5, 2009

DocketCV07050190 A137605

StatusPublished

This text of 213 P.3d 861 (Saxon v. Metro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saxon v. Metro, 213 P.3d 861, 230 Or. App. 247 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

213 P.3d 861 (2009) 230 Or. App. 247

Lila D. SAXON, Plaintiff-Respondent Cross-Appellant,
v.
METRO, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Respondent.

CV07050190; A137605.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted on July 15, 2009. Decided August 5, 2009.

Richard P. Benner, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Office of Metro Attorney.

Donald B. Bowerman, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. *862 With him on the briefs were Kristen S. David and Bowerman and David, PC.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

On appeal, judgments vacated; remanded for entry of judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims. Cross-appeal dismissed as moot. Bleeg v. Metro, 229 Or.App. 210, 211 P.3d 302 (2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

213 P.3d 861 (2009) 230 Or. App. 247

Lila D. SAXON, Plaintiff-Respondent Cross-Appellant,
v.
METRO, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Respondent.

CV07050190; A137605.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted on July 15, 2009. Decided August 5, 2009.

Richard P. Benner, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Office of Metro Attorney.

Donald B. Bowerman, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. *862 With him on the briefs were Kristen S. David and Bowerman and David, PC.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

On appeal, judgments vacated; remanded for entry of judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims. Cross-appeal dismissed as moot. Bleeg v. Metro, 229 Or.App. 210, 211 P.3d 302 (2009).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 P.3d 861, 230 Or. App. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saxon-v-metro-orctapp-2009.

Opinion

Lila D. SAXON, Plaintiff-Respondent Cross-Appellant, v. METRO, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Respondent.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Lila D. SAXON, Plaintiff-Respondent Cross-Appellant,
v.
METRO, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Respondent.