Saval v. Holder

Ninth Circuit

Saval v. Holder

623 F.3d 666

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 5, 2011

Docket05-75622

StatusPublished

This text of 623 F.3d 666 (Saval v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saval v. Holder, 623 F.3d 666 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VINO KUMAR SAVAL and GITA  KAMALA NANIKRAM, No. 05-75622 Petitioners, Agency Nos. v.  A071-950-956 ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney A071-950-957 General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed May 5, 2011

Before: John T. Noonan, M. Margaret McKeown1, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Respondent’s motion to vacate the judgment is granted. The opinion and dissent filed on September 23, 2010 are hereby withdrawn.

1 Judge McKeown was drawn to replace Judge Hall on this panel after her death.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VINO KUMAR SAVAL and GITA  KAMALA NANIKRAM, No. 05-75622 Petitioners, Agency Nos. v.  A071-950-956 ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney A071-950-957 General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed May 5, 2011

Before: John T. Noonan, M. Margaret McKeown1, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Respondent’s motion to vacate the judgment is granted. The opinion and dissent filed on September 23, 2010 are hereby withdrawn.

1 Judge McKeown was drawn to replace Judge Hall on this panel after her death.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

623 F.3d 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saval-v-holder-ca9-2011.