Savage v. Cain
This text of Savage v. Cain (Savage v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-30160 Summary Calendar
GREGORY SAVAGE,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary,
Respondent-Appellee.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CV-1540 --------------------
July 29, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge and HIGGINBOTHAM and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The district court granted a certificate of appealability
(COA) for Gregory Savage, Louisiana prisoner no. 127336, to
appeal whether exculpatory evidence was withheld in violation of
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963). Savage’s motion for
appointment of counsel is DENIED. Having reviewed the record,
the arguments on appeal, and the evidence in dispute -- a log of
the investigation made by Catahoula Parish Deputy Sheriff Paul A.
Blunchi, we hold that the evidence was neither material or
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-30160 -2-
exculpatory. There was thus no violation of Brady. See United
States v. Green, 46 F.3d 461, 464 (5th Cir. 1995). The district
court’s denial of Savage’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ
of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED.
Savage requests a COA to appeal whether counsel was
ineffective for failing to call and/or question various witnesses
about temporal discrepancies in evidence regarding when
investigators discovered that a phone call was placed to Savage’s
uncle from the crime scene. Savage has failed to make a
substantial showing that he was denied effective assistance of
counsel; COA is therefore DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
AFFIRMED; COA DENIED; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Savage v. Cain, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savage-v-cain-ca5-1999.