Saunders v. Saunders

52 So. 310, 166 Ala. 351, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 341
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 21, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 52 So. 310 (Saunders v. Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saunders v. Saunders, 52 So. 310, 166 Ala. 351, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 341 (Ala. 1910).

Opinion

SIMPSON, J.

This is a bill filed by the appellee, by her next friend, praying for the appointment of a guardian, and also that the custody of said infant be transferred from her father, C. W. Saunders, and wife, to her grand father, J. B. Gilmore.

The testimony in this case has been carefully examined, and it is not entirely free from conflict. Said Annie Gordon Saunders is the daughter of said C. W. Saunders by his first wife, who died when the child was about two years old, and she lived with her maternal grandparents until after her father had married again [352]*352and either had or would shortly have another child, something less than two years before the trial, at which time said infant was ten years old. No evidence was introduced tending to show that said grandparents were not proper persons to have the custody of the child, or that she is not happy with them. On the other hand, the fact that the child has run away four times from her father, to go to her grandparents, is a strong circumstance tending to show her preference.

We agree with the chancellor that no good can he accomplished by discussing the testimony. In fact, some of it had better be forgotten than perpetuated. While we recognize that, as a general proposition, the father has the right to the custody of the child, yet the ;good of the child must be the main consideration of the court, and from a careful consideration of the evidence we conclude that the chancellor properly held “that the welfare of the child will be the best promoted, for the present at least, by transferring her custody from her fathex*, C. W. Saunders, to her grandfather, J. B. Gilmore.”

The decree of the court is affirixxed.

Affirmed.

Dowdell, O. J., and McClellan and Sayre, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JC v. State Department of Human Resources
986 So. 2d 1172 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2007)
Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Tissier
106 So. 866 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Ex Parte Rickerson
82 So. 769 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1919)
Brown v. Brown
56 So. 589 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)
Montgomery v. Hughes
58 So. 113 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 So. 310, 166 Ala. 351, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-saunders-ala-1910.