Saunders v. Edenton ob/gyn Center

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided September 15, 2000·No. I.C. No. 308081·Published

Opinion

The decision filed by the North Carolina Supreme Court established that plaintiff in this matter does not enjoy a presumption of total disability, but rather has a presumption of partial disability. The Court also held that it was plaintiffs burden to rebut this presumption in moving forth with a claim for total disability. Finally, the Court noted that, should this arise, defendants would have the burden of rebutting the presumption of plaintiffs continued partial disability.

Given the issues raised by the Supreme Court and in accordance with its mandate, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall submit supplemental briefs on the current issues before the Full Commission within THRITY DAYS (30) of receipt of this Order.

No additional costs are assessed at this time.

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saunders v. Edenton ob/gyn Center, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2000).

Saunders v. Edenton ob/gyn Center (Saunders v. Edenton ob/gyn Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.