Satterfield v. Boles
408 F.2d 1029
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 7, 1969·No. No. 11689·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Denial of habeas corpus is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Judge, 297 F.Supp. 609.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Satterfield v. Boles, 408 F.2d 1029 (4th Cir. 1969).
408 F.2d 1029 (Satterfield v. Boles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robert Clinton Satterfield v. Otto C. Boles, Warden of the West Virginia State Penitentiary
408 F.2d 1029 (Fourth Circuit, 1969)