Satterfield v. Boles
408 F.2d 1029
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 7, 1969
DocketNo. 11689
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 408 F.2d 1029 (Satterfield v. Boles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Satterfield v. Boles, 408 F.2d 1029 (4th Cir. 1969).
Opinion
Denial of habeas corpus is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Judge, 297 F.Supp. 609.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Robert Clinton Satterfield v. Otto C. Boles, Warden of the West Virginia State Penitentiary
408 F.2d 1029 (Fourth Circuit, 1969)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
408 F.2d 1029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/satterfield-v-boles-ca4-1969.