Robert Clinton Satterfield v. Otto C. Boles, Warden of the West Virginia State Penitentiary
This text of 408 F.2d 1029 (Robert Clinton Satterfield v. Otto C. Boles, Warden of the West Virginia State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Clinton SATTERFIELD, Appellant,
v.
Otto C. BOLES, Warden of the West Virginia State
Penitentiary, Appellee.
No. 11689.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued March 4, 1969.
Decided March 7, 1969.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins; Robert E. Maxwell, Judge.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and CRAVEN and BUTZNER, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM:
Denial of habeas corpus is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Judge, 297 F.Supp. 609.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
408 F.2d 1029, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-clinton-satterfield-v-otto-c-boles-warden-o-ca4-1969.