Robert Clinton Satterfield v. Otto C. Boles, Warden of the West Virginia State Penitentiary

408 F.2d 1029, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13344
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 7, 1969·No. 11689·Published

Opinion

408 F.2d 1029

Robert Clinton SATTERFIELD, Appellant,
v.
Otto C. BOLES, Warden of the West Virginia State
Penitentiary, Appellee.

No. 11689.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 4, 1969.
Decided March 7, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins; Robert E. Maxwell, Judge.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and CRAVEN and BUTZNER, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM:

Denial of habeas corpus is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Judge, 297 F.Supp. 609.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Clinton Satterfield v. Otto C. Boles, Warden of the West Virginia State Penitentiary, 408 F.2d 1029, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13344 (4th Cir. 1969).

408 F.2d 1029 (Robert Clinton Satterfield v. Otto C. Boles, Warden of the West Virginia State Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Satterfield v. Boles
297 F. Supp. 609 (N.D. West Virginia, 1967)
Satterfield v. Boles
408 F.2d 1029 (Fourth Circuit, 1969)