Satellite Cellular Systems v. Federal Communications Commission, Thomas Domencich and the Committee for a Fair Lottery, Intervenors
This text of 923 F.2d 201 (Satellite Cellular Systems v. Federal Communications Commission, Thomas Domencich and the Committee for a Fair Lottery, Intervenors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
923 F.2d 201
287 U.S.App.D.C. 378
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
SATELLITE CELLULAR SYSTEMS, Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee,
Thomas Domencich and the Committee for a Fair Lottery, Intervenors.
No. 90-1204.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Nov. 23, 1990.
Before HARRY T. Edwards, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellee's motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto, and the reply, and the notice of intention to intervene, the response thereto, and the reply, it is
ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted substantially for the reasons stated by appellee Federal Communications Commission in its memorandum opinion and order released March 20, 1990. Satellite Cellular Systems, FCC 90-96 (released March 20, 1990). The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Cascade Broadcasting Group, Ltd. v. FCC, 822 F.2d 1172, 1174 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the notice of intention to intervene be dismissed as moot.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
923 F.2d 201, 287 U.S. App. D.C. 378, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 23306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/satellite-cellular-systems-v-federal-communication-cadc-1990.