Sasser v. Beck

259 S.E.2d 915

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 10, 1979·Published

Opinion

259 S.E.2d 915 (1979)

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 10, 1979.

Duke & Brown, Hulse & Hulse, for plaintiff.

Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, for defendant.

Petition by defendant Sam Beck for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 40 N.C.App. 668, 253 S.E.2d 577. Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

259 S.E.2d 915 (1979)

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 10, 1979.

Duke & Brown, Hulse & Hulse, for plaintiff.

Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, for defendant.

Petition by defendant Sam Beck for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 40 N.C.App. 668, 253 S.E.2d 577. Denied.

Sasser v. Beck, 259 S.E.2d 915 (N.C. 1979).

Pincite

259 S.E.2d 915 (Sasser v. Beck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

253 S.E.2d 577 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)