Sasser v. Beck

259 S.E.2d 915
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 10, 1979
StatusPublished

This text of 259 S.E.2d 915 (Sasser v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sasser v. Beck, 259 S.E.2d 915 (N.C. 1979).

Opinion

259 S.E.2d 915 (1979)

James Graham SASSER, by his Guardian ad Litem, H. Bruce Hulse
v.
Sam BECK and wife, Mrs. Sam Beck, t/a the Princess Motel.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 10, 1979.

Duke & Brown, Hulse & Hulse, for plaintiff.

Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, for defendant.

Petition by defendant Sam Beck for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 40 N.C.App. 668, 253 S.E.2d 577. Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sasser v. Beck
253 S.E.2d 577 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 S.E.2d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sasser-v-beck-nc-1979.