Sarwark v. Thorneycroft
597 P.2d 9, 123 Ariz. 23, 1979 Ariz. LEXIS 291
Opinion
The decision of the Court of Appeals in Sarwark v. Thorneycroft, et al., 123 Ariz. 1, 596 P.2d 1173 (1979), is approved for the reasons therein stated.
The decision in Fumusa v. State Board of Pharmacy, 25 Ariz.App. 584, 545 P.2d 432 (1976), is disapproved.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sarwark v. Thorneycroft, 597 P.2d 9, 123 Ariz. 23, 1979 Ariz. LEXIS 291 (Ark. 1979).
597 P.2d 9 (Sarwark v. Thorneycroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
SVENDSEN v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
323 P.3d 1179 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2014)
Stant v. City of Maricopa Employee Merit Board
319 P.3d 1002 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2014)
Richard Anderson v. Valley Union High School District 22
Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2012
Anderson v. VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL
270 P.3d 879 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2012)
Berry v. Superior Court
788 P.2d 1258 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1989)
Tempe Life Care Village, Inc. v. City of Tempe
714 P.2d 434 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1985)
Todd v. Todd
670 P.2d 1228 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1983)
Burnett v. Walter
660 P.2d 1234 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1982)
Pesqueira v. Pima County Assessor
650 P.2d 1237 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1982)
Pace v. Pace
626 P.2d 619 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1981)