Sarkissian v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedMarch 15, 2022
Docket3:22-cv-01292
StatusUnknown

This text of Sarkissian v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (Sarkissian v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sarkissian v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, (N.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2846

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -81)

On August 2, 2018, the Panel transferred 50 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 316 F.Supp.3d 1380 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 305 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge Sargus. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of August 2, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

ttf bel a true Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: □□ pending at this time, the | | erat LL, pf BA hal my Nagar Mar 15, 2022 es CLERK'S OFFICE Ciel aa, John W. Nichols MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Clerk of the Panel oh fi

ee

IN RE: DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC., POLYPROPYLENE HERNIA MESH PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2846

SCHEDULE CTO-81 — TAG—ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 22—01292 Sarkissian v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals et al

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Prods. Liab. Litig.
316 F. Supp. 3d 1380 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sarkissian v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sarkissian-v-kaiser-foundation-hospitals-cand-2022.