Sargent v. Smith, No. Cv989 35 35 95 S (Apr. 4, 2002)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 4301
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedApril 4, 2002
DocketNo. CV989 35 35 95 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 4301 (Sargent v. Smith, No. Cv989 35 35 95 S (Apr. 4, 2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sargent v. Smith, No. Cv989 35 35 95 S (Apr. 4, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 4301 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: ACCEPTANCE OF ATTORNEY TRIAL REFEREE REPORT
The objections to the acceptance of the referee's report are overruled. The attorney trial referee's recommendations are supported by the findings in the report.

The applicable standards for this court's review have been discussed by our Supreme Court, see Meadows v. Higgins, 249 Conn. 155, 162, 733 A.2d 172 (1999), and our Appellate Court, see Post Road Iron Works v. LexingtonDev. Group, 54 Conn. App. 534, 539, 736 A.2d 923 (1999). The court has reviewed the attorney trial referee's report, the exhibits, the transcript of the proceeding before the attorney trial referee, the briefs that have been filed by the parties, and the pleadings. There is evidence in the record to support the findings of fact. The legal conclusions are supported by the subordinate facts.

Judgment may enter for the defendant against the plaintiff in accordance with the recommendations of the attorney trial referee.

THIM, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meadows v. Higgins
733 A.2d 172 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)
Post Road Iron Works, Inc. v. Lexington Development Group, Inc.
736 A.2d 923 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 4301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sargent-v-smith-no-cv989-35-35-95-s-apr-4-2002-connsuperct-2002.