Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC
625 F.3d 561, 2010 WL 4190718
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 26, 2010
DocketNos. 02-56256, 02-56390, 09-56381
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 625 F.3d 561 (Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC, 625 F.3d 561, 2010 WL 4190718 (9th Cir. 2010).
Opinions
Order; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD; Statement by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.
ORDER
This case is referred to Judge Edward Leavy to explore the possibility of mediation. Judge Leavy is requested to report to the en banc court within twenty-eight (28) days as to whether mediation should proceed or whether this case should be returned to the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC
671 F.3d 736 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
654 F.3d 11 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
625 F.3d 561, 2010 WL 4190718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sarei-v-rio-tinto-plc-ca9-2010.