Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC

Ninth Circuit

Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC

722 F.3d 1109, 2013 WL 3357740

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2013·No. Nos. 02-56256, 02-56390, 09-56381·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

[1110] ORDER

This case is before us after the Supreme Court’s order of April 22, 2013, vacating and remanding on the basis of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 1659, 185 L.Ed.2d 671 (2013). The parties have submitted supplemental briefs on the effect of that decision.

Upon due consideration, a majority of the en banc court has voted to affirm the district court’s judgment of dismissal with prejudice. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1110] ORDER

This case is before us after the Supreme Court’s order of April 22, 2013, vacating and remanding on the basis of Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 1659, 185 L.Ed.2d 671 (2013). The parties have submitted supplemental briefs on the effect of that decision.

Upon due consideration, a majority of the en banc court has voted to affirm the district court’s judgment of dismissal with prejudice. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC, 722 F.3d 1109, 2013 WL 3357740 (9th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

722 F.3d 1109 (Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related