Saper v. Sussman
185 Misc. 277, 56 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2031
Opinion
Under the rules and regulations of the Treasury Department, the bond in question could not be transferred by way of gift, sale or pledge (Code of Fed. Beg., Cum. Supp., tit. 31, § 315.8). The bond, therefore, remained the property of the bankrupt and was subject to replevy by.the trustee in bankruptcy.
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.
Hammer, Shientag and Eder, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saper v. Sussman, 185 Misc. 277, 56 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
185 Misc. 277 (Saper v. Sussman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ab intestato of Boris Nakdimen
83 P.R. 441 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1961)
Ab Intestato de Nakdimen
83 P.R. Dec. 459 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1961)
Barrios v. Heirs of Manzano
79 P.R. 895 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1957)
Barrios v. Sucn. Manzano
79 P.R. Dec. 950 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1957)
Nelson v. Wheeler
256 P.2d 1080 (Montana Supreme Court, 1953)
Brown v. Vinson
216 S.W.2d 748 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1949)
Hatfield v. Buck
193 Misc. 1041 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
In Re Bartlett
71 F. Supp. 514 (N.D. New York, 1947)
Moore's Adm'r v. Marshall
196 S.W.2d 369 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1946)