Santucci v. Robinson

123 A.D.2d 897, 507 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61016

This text of 123 A.D.2d 897 (Santucci v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santucci v. Robinson, 123 A.D.2d 897, 507 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61016 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

In a special proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 4 to appoint a Special District Attorney pursuant to County Law § 701, in order to prosecute the respondent Thomas Robinson, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), dated October 17, 1986, which denied the application.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, it cannot be said that [898]*898it was an abuse of the court’s discretion to deny the instant application (see, Matter of Morgenthau v Crane, 113 AD2d 20; Matter of Schumer v Holtzman, 60 NY2d 46). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schumer v. Holtzman
454 N.E.2d 522 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Morgenthau v. Crane
113 A.D.2d 20 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 A.D.2d 897, 507 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santucci-v-robinson-nyappdiv-1986.