Santucci v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Santucci v. Robinson

123 A.D.2d 897, 507 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61016

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 1986·Published

Opinion

In a special proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 4 to appoint a Special District Attorney pursuant to County Law § 701, in order to prosecute the respondent Thomas Robinson, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), dated October 17, 1986, which denied the application.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, it cannot be said that [898] it was an abuse of the court’s discretion to deny the instant application (see, Matter of Morgenthau v Crane, 113 AD2d 20; Matter of Schumer v Holtzman, 60 NY2d 46). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a special proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 4 to appoint a Special District Attorney pursuant to County Law § 701, in order to prosecute the respondent Thomas Robinson, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), dated October 17, 1986, which denied the application.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, it cannot be said that [898] it was an abuse of the court’s discretion to deny the instant application (see, Matter of Morgenthau v Crane, 113 AD2d 20; Matter of Schumer v Holtzman, 60 NY2d 46). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Brown and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Santucci v. Robinson, 123 A.D.2d 897, 507 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61016 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

123 A.D.2d 897 (Santucci v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related