Santoro v. Corona Fuel Oil & Ice Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Santoro v. Corona Fuel Oil & Ice Co.

281 A.D.2d 615, 722 N.Y.S.2d 184, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3063

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 281 A.D.2d 615 (Santoro v. Corona Fuel Oil & Ice Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santoro v. Corona Fuel Oil & Ice Co., 281 A.D.2d 615, 722 N.Y.S.2d 184, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3063 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garson, J.), dated April 19, 2000, which denied their motion, in effect, to vacate their default in answering and in appearing at the subsequent inquest on damages.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion, in effect, to vacate their default, as they failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse therefor (see, Wynne v Wagner, 262 AD2d 556; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garson, J.), dated April 19, 2000, which denied their motion, in effect, to vacate their default in answering and in appearing at the subsequent inquest on damages.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion, in effect, to vacate their default, as they failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse therefor (see, Wynne v Wagner, 262 AD2d 556; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 615, 722 N.Y.S.2d 184, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santoro-v-corona-fuel-oil-ice-co-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack