Perry v. Drago
This text of 286 A.D.2d 322 (Perry v. Drago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered October 6, 2000, as denied his motion to vacate a judgment entered against him upon his default in answering.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion to vacate his default as he failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse therefor (see, Tummina v Royal Carting Serv., 282 AD2d [323]*323670; Santoro v Corona Fuel Oil & Ice Co., 281 AD2d 615). Bracken, P. J., Friedmann, Florio, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.D.2d 322, 728 N.Y.S.2d 690, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-drago-nyappdiv-2001.