Santiago v. Tanaka

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Santiago v. Tanaka. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 Haw. 137
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 2016·No. SCWC-11-0000697·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000697

15-JAN-2016

12:23 PM

SCWC-11-0000697

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

LOUIS ROBERT SANTIAGO, as Trustee of the Louis Robert Santiago Revocable Living Trust dated November 17, 1999, as amended, and YONG HWAN SANTIAGO, as Trustee of the Yong Shimabukuro Revocable Living Trust dated July 25, 1996, as amended, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, vs.

RUTH TANAKA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000697; CIVIL NO. 08-1-0094)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATON (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Respondent/Defendant­ Appellee/Cross-Appellant Ruth Tanaka’s motion for reconsideration, filed on January 6, 2016, the papers in support thereof, and the records and files herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted in part as reflected in the modifications to footnotes 37 and 40 in

the amended opinion filed herewith; otherwise, the motion is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 15, 2016.

Gary Victor Dubin and /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald Frederick J. Arensmeyer for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Robert Goldberg /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Santiago v. Tanaka, (haw 2016).

Santiago v. Tanaka (Santiago v. Tanaka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.