Santiago v. Rumsfeld

403 F.3d 702, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5439
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2005·No. 05-35005_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

403 F.3d 702

Emiliano SANTIAGO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Les Brownlee, Secretary of the United States Department of the Army (Acting); Raymond Byrne, Acting Adjutant General of the Oregon National Guard; David Doran, Captain, Detachment One, Company D, 113 Aviation Unit Commander, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 05-35005.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued, Submitted and Filed April 6, 2005.

Steven Goldberg, Esq., Goldberg, Mechanic, Stuart and Gibson, LLP, Portland, OR, for the appellant.

H. Thomas Byron, III, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Owen M. Panner, Senior Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-01747-OMP.

Before WILLIAM C. CANBY, JR., RICHARD C. TALLMAN, and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The appellant's urgent motion for injunction pending appeal, which seeks to enjoin his deployment to Afghanistan, is DENIED.

The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. An opinion or opinions will follow in due course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Santiago v. Rumsfeld, 403 F.3d 702, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5439 (9th Cir. 2005).

403 F.3d 702 (Santiago v. Rumsfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jesus Perez Garcia
96 F.4th 1166 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)
Hassoun v. Searls
976 F.3d 121 (Second Circuit, 2020)