Santiago v. Rumsfeld
This text of Santiago v. Rumsfeld (Santiago v. Rumsfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EMILIANO SANTIAGO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; LES BROWNLEE, Secretary No. 05-35005 of the United States Department of the Army (Acting); RAYMOND D.C. No. CV-04-01747-OMP BYRNE, Acting Adjutant General of ORDER the Oregon National Guard; DAVID DORAN, Captain, Detachment One, Company D, 113 Aviation Unit Commander, Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Owen M. Panner, Senior Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 6, 2005—Seattle, Washington
Filed April 6, 2005
Before: William C. Canby, Jr., Richard C. Tallman, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.
COUNSEL
Steven Goldberg, Esq., Goldberg, Mechanic, Stuart and Gib- son, LLP, Portland, Oregon, for the appellant.
4173 4174 SANTIAGO v. RUMSFELD H. Thomas Byron, III, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the appellees.
ORDER
The appellant’s urgent motion for injunction pending appeal, which seeks to enjoin his deployment to Afghanistan, is DENIED.
The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. An opinion or opinions will follow in due course. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Santiago v. Rumsfeld, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-v-rumsfeld-ca9-2005.