Santana v. State

67 So. 3d 1176, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14677, 2011 WL 3602960
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Santana v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 So. 3d 1262
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 17, 2011·No. 2D10-911·Published

Opinion

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Francisco Tito Santana appeals the order revoking his probation and the sentence imposed upon the revocation. We affirm but remand with instructions to strike the reference to the violation of condition numbers two and nine from the order revoking probation so that the order conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. See Turner v. State, 873 So.2d 480, 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (“A written order of revocation of probation must conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncement.”) (citation omitted).

Affirmed, but remanded with instructions.

NORTHCUTT and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Santana v. State, 67 So. 3d 1176, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14677, 2011 WL 3602960 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

67 So. 3d 1176 (Santana v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. State
873 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)