Santana v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Santana v. Auto-Owners Insurance

631 N.E.2d 123, 69 Ohio St. 3d 182

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 4, 1994·No. No. 93-1349·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

This cause is before this court upon the certification of the Court of Appeals for Lucas County that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County in Miller v. Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. (1969), 20 Ohio App.2d 323, 49 O.O.2d 451, 253 N.E.2d 801.

Having examined Miller and the record in the present cause, we find that the judgments do not conflict. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Copeco, Inc. v. Caley (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 79, 630 N.E.2d 662; Whitelock v. Gilbane Bldg. Co. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 594, 613 N.E.2d 1032; Freeman v. Holzer Med. Ctr. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 601, 613 N.E.2d 1037; State v. Parobek (1990) 49 Ohio St.3d 61, 550 N.E.2d 476; State v. Radar (1989), 47 Ohio St.3d 112, 548 N.E.2d 210; Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hosp. Med. Ctr. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 60, 526 N.E.2d 307; Cook v. Mayfield (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 44, 523 N.E.2d 502; State v. Palider (1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 68, 514 N.E.2d 873.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Christley, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Judith A Christley, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause is before this court upon the certification of the Court of Appeals for Lucas County that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County in Miller v. Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. (1969), 20 Ohio App.2d 323, 49 O.O.2d 451, 253 N.E.2d 801.

Having examined Miller and the record in the present cause, we find that the judgments do not conflict. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Copeco, Inc. v. Caley (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 79, 630 N.E.2d 662; Whitelock v. Gilbane Bldg. Co. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 594, 613 N.E.2d 1032; Freeman v. Holzer Med. Ctr. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 601, 613 N.E.2d 1037; State v. Parobek (1990) 49 Ohio St.3d 61, 550 N.E.2d 476; State v. Radar (1989), 47 Ohio St.3d 112, 548 N.E.2d 210; Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hosp. Med. Ctr. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 60, 526 N.E.2d 307; Cook v. Mayfield (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 44, 523 N.E.2d 502; State v. Palider (1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 68, 514 N.E.2d 873.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Christley, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Judith A Christley, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J.

Santana v. Auto-Owners Insurance, 631 N.E.2d 123, 69 Ohio St. 3d 182 (Ohio 1994).

Pincite

631 N.E.2d 123 (Santana v. Auto-Owners Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related