Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center

526 N.E.2d 307, 38 Ohio St. 3d 60, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 222
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 20, 1988·No. No. 87-2104·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The court of appeals found that its judgment in this case was in conflict with the judgment of the Third District Court of Appeals in Naugle v. Campbell Soup Co. (June 20, 1986), Henry App. No. 7-84-24, unreported, on the question of whether an expert’s affidavit which does not specifically list facts supporting his conclusion of neg[61] ligence is sufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment. Therefore, the court of appeals certified the case to this court pursuant to Section 3(B), Article IV, Constitution.

We find that the judgments of the courts of appeals do not conflict on the certified question. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. State v. Palider (1987), 33 Ohio St. 3d 68, 514 N.E. 2d 873; Cook v. Mayfield (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 44, 523 N.E. 2d 502.

Moyer, C.J., Cacioppo, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Mary Cacioppo, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center, 526 N.E.2d 307, 38 Ohio St. 3d 60, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 222 (Ohio 1988).

526 N.E.2d 307 (Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santana v. Auto-Owners Insurance
631 N.E.2d 123 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Santana v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.
1994 Ohio 418 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Copeco, Inc. v. Caley
1994 Ohio 36 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Freeman v. Holzer Medical Center
66 Ohio St. 3d 601 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)
Freeman v. Holzer Med. Ctr.
1993 Ohio 211 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)
State v. Parobek
550 N.E.2d 476 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1990)
State v. Radar
548 N.E.2d 210 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)