Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center

Ohio Supreme Court

Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center

526 N.E.2d 307, 38 Ohio St. 3d 60, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 222

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 20, 1988

DocketNo. 87-2104

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 526 N.E.2d 307 (Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hospital Medical Center, 526 N.E.2d 307, 38 Ohio St. 3d 60, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 222 (Ohio 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

The court of appeals found that its judgment in this case was in conflict with the judgment of the Third District Court of Appeals in Naugle v. Campbell Soup Co. (June 20, 1986), Henry App. No. 7-84-24, unreported, on the question of whether an expert’s affidavit which does not specifically list facts supporting his conclusion of neg[61]*61ligence is sufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment. Therefore, the court of appeals certified the case to this court pursuant to Section 3(B), Article IV, Constitution.

We find that the judgments of the courts of appeals do not conflict on the certified question. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. State v. Palider (1987), 33 Ohio St. 3d 68, 514 N.E. 2d 873; Cook v. Mayfield (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 44, 523 N.E. 2d 502.

Moyer, C.J., Cacioppo, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Mary Cacioppo, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court of appeals found that its judgment in this case was in conflict with the judgment of the Third District Court of Appeals in Naugle v. Campbell Soup Co. (June 20, 1986), Henry App. No. 7-84-24, unreported, on the question of whether an expert’s affidavit which does not specifically list facts supporting his conclusion of neg[61]*61ligence is sufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment. Therefore, the court of appeals certified the case to this court pursuant to Section 3(B), Article IV, Constitution.

We find that the judgments of the courts of appeals do not conflict on the certified question. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. State v. Palider (1987), 33 Ohio St. 3d 68, 514 N.E. 2d 873; Cook v. Mayfield (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 44, 523 N.E. 2d 502.

Moyer, C.J., Cacioppo, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Mary Cacioppo, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

526 N.E.2d 307, 38 Ohio St. 3d 60, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hays-v-st-elizabeth-hospital-medical-center-ohio-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack