Santana Cline v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

711 F. App'x 182
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 2018
Docket17-2354
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 711 F. App'x 182 (Santana Cline v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santana Cline v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 711 F. App'x 182 (4th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Santana Cline seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny Cline’s motion for default judgment and to grant the motion of HSBC Bank USA, N.A., in opposition to the entry of default. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Cline seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Adult Film Ass’n of Am., Inc. v. Thetford, 776 F.2d 113, 115 (5th Cir. 1985) (order denying default judgment); Parks v. Collins, 761 F.2d 1101, 1104 (5th Cir. 1985) (order granting motion to set aside entry of default). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
711 F. App'x 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santana-cline-v-hsbc-bank-usa-na-ca4-2018.