Santa Fe, L. & E. R. v. Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co.

1917 OK 299, 166 P. 168, 64 Okla. 88, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 585
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 12, 1917
Docket4942
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1917 OK 299 (Santa Fe, L. & E. R. v. Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santa Fe, L. & E. R. v. Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co., 1917 OK 299, 166 P. 168, 64 Okla. 88, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 585 (Okla. 1917).

Opinion

TURNER, J.

This action was begun in the district court of Woodward county by the Wichita Falls & Northwestern Railway Company against Grace L. Smith, Santa Fe, Liberal & Englewood Railroad Company, and United States Mortgage & Trust Company, trustee, to condemn a right of way for its railroad over the N. W. % -of section 17, township 23 north, range 21 west, Woodward county. Upon petition being filed, the court appointed appraisers to assess the damage for said right of way, and upon the report of the commissioners being filed, exceptions were duly saved by the Santa Fe, Liberal & Englewood Railroad Company, plaintiff in error’, and the cause proceeded to trial before said district court. The court held that the land sought to he condemned by this proceeding was subject to condemnation by the Wichita Falls & Northwestern Railway Company, and that the easement formerly acquired by plaintiff in error over said land had been abandoned, and rendered judgment accordingly. Plaintiff in error alone appealed from said judgment, making, its code-fendants in the trial court defendants in error here.

This is a companion case to that of Canadian River Railroad Co. v. Wichita. Falls & Northwestern Ry. Co. et al., 64 Okla. 62, 166 Pac. 163, handed down simultaneously with this opinion, wherein we held that plaintiff in error had abandoned its right of way and that same was subject to condemnation by the Wichita Falls & Northwestern Railway Company, and affirmed the judgment of the trial court.

As the questions presented here are the same as were considered in the Canadian River Case, supra, and both eases were tried upon practically the same evidence, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed. It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Francis v. Rogers
2001 OK 111 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2001)
Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. Co. v. Rogers
1947 OK 235 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1917 OK 299, 166 P. 168, 64 Okla. 88, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santa-fe-l-e-r-v-wichita-falls-n-w-r-co-okla-1917.