Santa Barbara Lodge No. 605 v. Penzner

231 P.2d 595, 104 Cal. App. 2d 494
California Court of Appeal·Decided May 29, 1951·No. Civ. No. 18261·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

104 Cal.App.2d 494 (1951)

SANTA BARBARA LODGE NO. 605, LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE (a Corporation), Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM L. PENZNER, Respondent.

Civ. No. 18261.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

May 29, 1951.

McGee & De Loreto for Appellant.

Schauer, Ryon & McMahon and Guy E. Ward for Respondent.

WILSON, J.

This action was commenced in Santa Barbara County for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property in that county, or for damages in the event defendant should be unable to fulfill the terms of the contract.

Defendant's motion for change of venue to Los Angeles County on the ground that he is a resident of the latter county was granted and plaintiff has appealed from the order.

[1] The county in which the real property is situated is the county in which the case should be tried. (Code Civ. Proc., 392; Kopke v. Carlson, 98 Cal.App. 155, 157 [276 P. 606]; McFarland v. Martin, 144 Cal. 771, 774 [78 P. 239].)

Order reversed.

Moore, P. J., and McComb, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Santa Barbara Lodge No. 605 v. Penzner, 231 P.2d 595, 104 Cal. App. 2d 494 (Cal. Ct. App. 1951).

231 P.2d 595 (Santa Barbara Lodge No. 605 v. Penzner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prawoto v. PrimeLending
720 F. Supp. 2d 1149 (C.D. California, 2010)
Foundation Engineers, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA CTY.
19 Cal. App. 4th 104 (California Court of Appeal, 1993)
Hammon v. American Exploration & Mining Co.
203 Cal. App. 2d 306 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
Apartments, Inc. v. Trott
342 P.2d 32 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)