SANS SOUCI GATED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. OLEG LUKOV

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 10, 2021
Docket20-0426
StatusPublished

This text of SANS SOUCI GATED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. OLEG LUKOV (SANS SOUCI GATED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. OLEG LUKOV) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SANS SOUCI GATED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. OLEG LUKOV, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 10, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-0426 Lower Tribunal No. 13-16521 ________________

Sans Souci Gated Homeowners Association, Inc., Appellant,

vs.

Oleg Lukov, et al., Appellees.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Barbara Areces, Judge.

Law Offices of Blynn and Blynn, P.A., and Esther T. Blynn; and Ilene F. Tuckfield, P.A., and Ilene F. Tuckfield, for appellant.

Law Offices of Paul H. Field, and Paul H. Field; and Law Office of Evan M. Feldman, and Evan M. Feldman, for appellees.

Before SCALES, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.

MILLER, J. Appellant challenges a final order denying entitlement to sanctions

pursuant to section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes. Finding no abuse of

discretion in the determination the lawsuit filed below was “supported by the

material facts necessary to establish the claim” and “by the application of

then-existing law,” we write only to address the sufficiency of the order on

appeal. § 57.105(1)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat. Although the law requires a trial court

to render findings of frivolity as a prerequisite to awarding fees under the

relevant statute, findings to the contrary are not necessary in denying such

fees. See § 57.105(1), Fla. Stat.; MC Liberty Express, Inc. v. All Points

Servs., Inc., 252 So. 3d 397, 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); Kurgan v. Morton D.

Weiner/AMPAC, Inc., 49 So. 3d 342, 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Shortes v.

Hill, 860 So. 2d 1, 2 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Mason v. Highlands Cnty. Bd. of

Cnty. Comm’rs, 817 So. 2d 922, 923 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Accordingly, we

discern no error and affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shortes v. Hill
860 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Mason v. HIGHLANDS COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS
817 So. 2d 922 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Mc Liberty Express v. All Points Services
252 So. 3d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Kurgan v. Morton D. Weiner/AMPAC, Inc.
49 So. 3d 342 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
SANS SOUCI GATED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. OLEG LUKOV, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sans-souci-gated-homeowners-association-inc-v-oleg-lukov-fladistctapp-2021.