Sanjeev Lath v. Oak Brook Condo Association, et al.
This text of 2017 DNH 197 (Sanjeev Lath v. Oak Brook Condo Association, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Sanjeev Lath
v. Civil No. 16-cv-463-LM Opinion No. 2017 DNH 197 Oak Brook Condominium Owners’ Association et al.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the court is plaintiff Sanjeev Lath’s motion (Doc.
No. 209), seeking to proceed in forma pauperis in his appeal of
the August 7, 2017 Order (Doc. No. 204). Lath’s appeal concerns
that Order’s establishment of a procedure restricting the filing
of motions in this action. See Not. Appeal (Doc. No. 210).
In determining whether an applicant may proceed on appeal
in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Fed.
R. App. P. 24(a), this court considers, among other things, the
applicant’s objective good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3);
Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). An appeal
that lacks any rational, arguable basis in law or fact is deemed
to be lacking in objective good faith. See Santiago-Lugo v.
United States, 94 F. Supp. 3d 156, 158 (D.P.R. 2015).
The August 7 Order (Doc. No. 204), in pertinent part, is a
procedural order. It is not reviewable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291
or § 1292(a), and it is not properly certified for interlocutory
review under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Lath’s appeal of that order is not grounded in any arguable basis in law or fact. Lath’s
motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. No. 209)
should be denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be
filed within fourteen days of receipt of this notice. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The fourteen-day period may be extended
upon motion. Failure to file specific written objections to the
Report and Recommendation within the specified time waives the
right to appeal the district court’s order. See Santos-Santos
v. Torres-Centeno, 842 F.3d 163, 168 (1st Cir. 2016).
______________________________ Andrea K. Johnstone United States Magistrate Judge
September 19, 2017
cc: Sanjeev Lath, pro se Gary M. Burt, Esq. Brendan D. O’Brien, Esq. Gerard Dufresne, pro se Daniel E. Will, Esq. Joshua M. Wyatt, Esq. Sabin R. Maxwell, Esq. Gregory V. Sullivan, Esq. Walter L. Maroney, Esq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 DNH 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanjeev-lath-v-oak-brook-condo-association-et-al-nhd-2017.