Sanford v. Powers

93 A.D.2d 985
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 1983
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 93 A.D.2d 985 (Sanford v. Powers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanford v. Powers, 93 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from an order vacating a default judgment. Thereafter an order of preclusion was entered conditioned upon plaintiff’s serving a bill of particulars within 60 days of the service of the order. Plaintiff contends that it was an abuse of discretion to grant the preclusion order while his appeal was pending. We have now affirmed the order vacating the default judgment (see Sanford v Powers, 93 AD2d 985). Although we find that Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting the order of preclusion, we modify the order, pursuant to CPLR 2004, only to extend plaintiff’s time to serve the bill of particulars within 60 days from entry and service of a copy of the order herein. [986]*986(Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Johnson, J. — preclusion.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr and Boomer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanford v. Powers
93 A.D.2d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A.D.2d 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanford-v-powers-nyappdiv-1983.