Sanfilippo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

74 A.D.2d 600, 424 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10248
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 11, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 74 A.D.2d 600 (Sanfilippo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanfilippo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 74 A.D.2d 600, 424 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10248 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 10, 1979, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s cross motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ cause of action for punitive damages. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The law is well settled that punitive damages are not recoverable for a mere breach of contract, for in such case only a private wrong, not a public right is involved (Garrity v Lyle Stuart, Inc., 40 NY2d 354). The second cause of action is simply predicated upon a private breach of contract and does not seek to vindicate a public right. Furthermore, the allegations set forth in the complaint do not demonstrate that defendant, an insurer, has engaged "' "in a fraudulent scheme evincing such 'a high degree of moral turpitude and * * * such wanton dishonesty as to imply a criminal indifference to civil obligations’ ” ’ ” (see Hubbell v Trans World Life Ins. Co. of N. Y., 70 AD2d 949; M. S. R. Assoc, v Consolidated Mut. Ins. Co., 58 AD2d 858). In addition, a demand for punitive damages does not constitute a separate cause of [601]*601action for pleading purposes. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wald v. Morris Heights Ltd. Partnership
147 A.D.2d 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Beck v. General Tire & Rubber Co.
98 A.D.2d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Bader's Residence for Adults v. Telecom Equipment Corp.
90 A.D.2d 764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
J. G. S., Inc. v. Lifetime Cutlery Corp.
87 A.D.2d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Bialek v. Racal-Milgo, Inc.
545 F. Supp. 25 (S.D. New York, 1982)
Lubrication & Maintenance, Inc. v. Union Resources Co.
522 F. Supp. 1078 (S.D. New York, 1981)
Brandenberg v. Cross
78 A.D.2d 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 A.D.2d 600, 424 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanfilippo-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1980.