Sandstrom v. State

390 So. 2d 448
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 19, 1980
Docket79-2119
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 390 So. 2d 448 (Sandstrom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sandstrom v. State, 390 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

390 So.2d 448 (1980)

Ray SANDSTROM, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 79-2119.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 19, 1980.
Rehearing Denied December 17, 1980.

Ray Sandstrom, of Sandstrom & Haddad, Fort Lauderdale, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order holding appellant in direct criminal contempt. First, appellant attacks the validity of the underlying order. Since the trial court had jurisdiction to render the underlying order and the order was not transparently invalid or a mere frivolous pretense to validity, the propriety of said order became insulated from attack upon the contemptuous violation thereof. Sandstrom v. State, 309 So.2d 17 (Fla.4th DCA 1975), cert. discharged 336 So.2d 572 *449 (Fla. 1976) relying, in part, on Walker v. City of Birmingham, 388 U.S. 307, 315, 87 S.Ct. 1824, 1829, 18 L.Ed.2d 1210 (1967); In re Estate of Coveney, 324 So.2d 681 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

Appellant's next assertion that his failure to appear in court on the day and time ordered could not be the basis for a direct contempt, but only an indirect contempt, is erroneous. Aron v. Huttoe, 258 So.2d 272 (Fla.3d DCA 1972), adopted 265 So.2d 699 (Fla. 1972); see James v. State, 385 So.2d 1145 (Fla.3d DCA 1980).

Finally, in open court the trial court orally sentenced appellant to twenty-four hours in jail in addition to a fine of $2,000. When reduced to a writing the order recited jail time of forty-eight hours as well as the $2,000 fine. The written order must be corrected to conform to the oral pronouncement. Byrd v. State, 388 So.2d 1362 (Fla.5th DCA 1980); Towson v. State, 382 So.2d 870 (Fla.5th DCA 1980); Sampson v. State, 375 So.2d 325 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Chester v. State, 355 So.2d 509 (Fla.2d DCA 1978); Sing Eng v. State, 350 So.2d 559 (Fla.2d DCA 1977).

REMANDED for correction of the sentence; otherwise AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Speer v. State
742 So. 2d 373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Mackey v. State
631 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Westbrook v. State
617 So. 2d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Woods v. State
600 So. 2d 27 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Scrimshaw v. State
592 So. 2d 753 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Whatley v. State
584 So. 2d 219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Rogers v. State
561 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Robinson v. State
548 So. 2d 908 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
McQueen v. State
531 So. 2d 1030 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Gelman v. State
24 Fla. Supp. 2d 122 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1987)
Dailey v. State
471 So. 2d 1349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Healey v. State
464 So. 2d 213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Manno v. State
10 Fla. Supp. 2d 35 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1985)
Jeffrey v. State
456 So. 2d 1307 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Timmons v. State
453 So. 2d 143 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Frost v. State
430 So. 2d 501 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Brown v. State
423 So. 2d 599 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Sirmons v. State
405 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State Ex Rel. Coody v. Muszynski
404 So. 2d 165 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Swanson v. State
399 So. 2d 469 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
390 So. 2d 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandstrom-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.