Mackey v. State
This text of 631 So. 2d 382 (Mackey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, John Mackey, appeals his sentence contending that the trial court’s sentencing order did not conform to its oral pronouncement of sentence. We affirm.
A review of the record reveals that the court reporter made a scrivener’s error in the original transcript. Upon correction of the scrivener’s error, we determine that the trial court’s sentencing order conforms with the oral pronouncement of sentence. We therefore affirm on the rationale of Brown v. State, 423 So.2d 599, 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) and Sandstrom v. State, 390 So.2d 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), review denied, 397 So.2d 779 (Fla.1981).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
631 So. 2d 382, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1018, 1994 WL 45303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mackey-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.