Sandra Polin v. Andy Behrman

Ninth Circuit

Sandra Polin v. Andy Behrman

429 F. App'x 682

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 27, 2011

Docket11-55075

StatusUnpublished

This text of 429 F. App'x 682 (Sandra Polin v. Andy Behrman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sandra Polin v. Andy Behrman, 429 F. App'x 682 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiffs-appellants Sandra Segal Polin and Lauri Kritt Martin appeal the district court’s denial of their request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendantsappellees Andy Behrman and Skywriting, LLC. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying the preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiffs-appellants Sandra Segal Polin and Lauri Kritt Martin appeal the district court’s denial of their request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendantsappellees Andy Behrman and Skywriting, LLC. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying the preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

429 F. App'x 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandra-polin-v-andy-behrman-ca9-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack